April 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Testing latest 2.2.0M1/2 releases

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

The snapshot worked. At least the smoke tests passed on my machine. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223996#4223996 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223996

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: AS 5 not reliably picking up changes in exploded EAR

by alesj

The issue is not do we temp or not. And controlling this is not hard or hacky. ;-) e.g. simple jboss-structure.xml will do or adding a simple ModificationTypeMatcher. The real issue is why this worked before, when we always temped everything. Which is exactly what we do here - we temp - but it doesn't work. So far I got zero useful information from JBossWeb, old WarDeployer authors, ... "jason.greene(a)jboss.com" wrote : | However, I can make a very good educated guess, that tomcat just calls getResource on a standard xhtml request, which is of course going to point to the tmp. | Where is this piece of code? Or where does TC/JBW do a check for if the resource has changed? That's all I need to know, and I'll dig it up from there. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223990#4223990 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223990

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Improving the process of applying AnnotationPlugins on M

by alesj

Afaik this is the only place. But otoh I don't know what AOP or anyone else is doing. Although I doubt they do a complete MDR/instance lookup. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223984#4223984 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223984

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Improving the process of applying AnnotationPlugins on M

by jaikiran

Ales, I am not completely familiar with the MC internals, but i guess there might be some place where MC already does annotation scanning (for some other requirement maybe) on the MC bean. Maybe MC could at that point itself "register" appropriate annotation plugins on finding the annotation? Is this possible or is CommonAnnotationAdapter the place where this annotation scanning happens for the first time (the only time?). View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223983#4223983 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223983

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1800 Improving InjectInterceptorsFactory

by jaikiran

Done as part of https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1801 and will be available in this week's release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223981#4223981 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223981

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: JBAS-5703 - Make HA-JNDI use wait for first positive res

by galder.zamarreno＠jboss.com

The moment I have a reponse that matches the following statement, I don't need any more responses. No need to keep list of responses. lookupSucceeded = (response != null) && !(response instanceof Exception) && !(response instanceof NoHandlerForRPC); Hence, currently my only state is a boolean arising from that statement and in needMoreResponses(), all I do is return: return !(lookupSucceeded); Hence, having response and address in needMoreResponses() would avoid me having to cache that boolean because right now, I only have access to the response in isAcceptable. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223978#4223978 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223978

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Clustered example and a few other example things

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : This meant I had to change all the directories journal, bindings, large messages so each server was using a distinct set. You will have to do this anyway since the they are created relatively from the example base dir not the config dir. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223973#4223973 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223973

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Clustered example and a few other example things

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : One thing that I found confusing is the usage of two beans files - one for each server. We need 2 beans configs as the naming server ports are configured in them. I could still create 2 configs dirs to make things simpler but each would have its own beans file and configuration. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223962#4223962 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223962

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - updated dependencies

by ataylor

Ive updated the JBM 2 libs. I would recommend deleting your thirdparty dir. I can probably reduce these again by removing commom-core and adding the individual libs, but since time is short I'll look at this after Beta. Also, a few of the new libs are only at CR so these will need updating once A 5.1 is released. Regarding Maven, if we have to support updating the old repos everytime we need new libs it might be worth while. Maven also lets you download specific jars from a project so it would make our distro smaller. We could still use Ant as the build just have a pom instead of a build-thirdparty.xml. Maybe after Beta. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223948#4223948 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223948

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: AS 5 not reliably picking up changes in exploded EAR

by dimitris＠jboss.org

JBoss 4 copied to tmp whatever was packed, top-level or nested. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223939#4223939 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223939

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2009