April 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM 4 Emails Sync vs Async

by jbarrez

Tom, I don't follow you with the global setting. I still think it should be able to be configured on the node itself. Imo, there are cases in which you want the mail directly: eg for handling an exception or a timer times out when waiting for an external system -> send an email to the system admin directly. In this case, scheduling it and waiting for the jobExecutor will cause a serious and unacceptable slow-down ... unless the jobExecutor is polling all the time (which is not good for performance). For normal mails, I agree they are to be scheduled. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223887#4223887 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223887

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM 4 Emails Sync vs Async

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

sending emails direct or asynchronous should be a global setting. also think about testing. i used dumpster before and that worked great for testing emails. if there is a global configuration property to send emails directly, then no special testing infrastructure should be provided. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223884#4223884 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223884

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: JBAS-5703 - Make HA-JNDI use wait for first positive res

by bela＠jboss.com

I don't see how passing the sender and response to needMoreResponses() would make your filter stateless: you probably would have to maintain a list of responses, keyed by sender, or update some counter anyway to be able to implement the filter. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223880#4223880 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223880

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Testing latest 2.2.0M1/2 releases

by alesj

I added some extra null checks. The snapshot is deployed, so if you can try it now. And it if works for you, I'll release a new M3. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223877#4223877 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223877

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM 4 Emails Sync vs Async

by jbarrez

Agreed, conceptually this is the best choice. Howerver, I would also like to have the synchronous option (as the non-default). Eg. for the sake of demos, this is much nicer to have ;-) But I'm sure there are other use cases. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223874#4223874 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223874

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM 4 Emails Sync vs Async

by camunda

+1 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223872#4223872 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223872

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Improving the process of applying AnnotationPlugins on M

by alesj

"jason.greene(a)jboss.com" wrote : | So why does it need to scan everything, if the MDR already knows how to fetch it lazily? Fetch it how or what? For each instance and its component (= member) the metadata can be different. So, you need to explicitly ask for every component's metadata via its signature. And afaik that's the only way you can get per instance metadata, but you can prove me wrong. ;-) WRT to over-abstracted crap ;-) having a way to add annotations via xml is a nice feature (OK, Emmanuel would disagree :-)), and @JMX is a perfect example of that. Hence when we make an annotation lookup, it should be done properly, taking those per instance annotations into an account. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223869#4223869 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223869

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Clustered example and a few other example things

by gaohoward

Hi Tim, I think using JNDI for connection factory and queue lookup in clustered examples is more consistent with other jms examples. We can show more of other ways to do this in the core examples. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223861#4223861 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223861

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Clustered example and a few other example things

by gaohoward

Thanks Tim. >>>For a test that uses JNDI to get the connection factorys and queus then we'll need to create two initial contexts. I think we can configure JNDI on each means config file using different ports. But there is only one client-jndi.properties, so i think for clustered example, we have to hard-code the jndi ENV. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223853#4223853 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223853

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Improving the process of applying AnnotationPlugins on M

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

"jason.greene(a)jboss.com" wrote : Now for an actual productive comment :) Is there any reason why the MDR has to eager allocate everything about every element of of every scanned class in memory like that? Any reason it can't just represent metadata as a series of overrides + lazily discovered / proxied calls to reflection data. Ah looking at the code, it seems this is basically what the MDR does, the problem seems to be that the API was designed for fetching specific elements, and depending on the usage, each access could be expensive (especially the reflection loader). So why does it need to scan everything, if the MDR already knows how to fetch it lazily? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223843#4223843 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223843

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2009