May 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Task assignment privileges

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

I am not asking for the scope. I am asking for an explanation of the concepts in place and their relation to each other. Regardless if we put into GA or not. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230744#4230744 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230744

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Task assignment privileges

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

authorization is out of scope for GA. for now we can just let anyone reassign. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230721#4230721 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230721

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Task assignment privileges

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Who is privileged to assign (not claim) or re-asign a task? How does this relate to "candidate-group" or "candidate-user" declarations? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230713#4230713 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230713

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: names for personal task list and takable task list

by camunda

My vote: "personal" and "group" task list. Takable is understable for me, aber not really the easiest word to find ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230712#4230712 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230712

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: DESCRIBE phase - Dependency builders for MC Beans

by alesj

I've applied a patch made by Kabir. There is now an @DisableAOP annotation, for which we check in AOPDB and AOPCJ. If present, we fall back to super behavior. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230710#4230710 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230710

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: All sorts of failures with JDK 1.6

by timfox

I wouldn't expect it to be fixed yet, since the netty issue hasn't been fixed yet. See the netty thread for more info. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230698#4230698 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230698

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: swimlane candidate roles - task list allocations

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

the contents of the 2 lists is clear: The user task list shows all the tasks that are directly assigned to the currently authenticated user. The group task list shows all the tasks that don't have an assignee and for which the currently authenticated user is a candidate. the only discussion that is left open is the name of those 2 lists: http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=155305 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230687#4230687 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230687

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: DESCRIBE phase - Dependency builders for MC Beans

by alesj

"jason.greene(a)jboss.com" wrote : | but if the performance sucks as bad as this does, no one will use it. | Didn't you use this with PojoCache, but never noticed the bad performance? ;-) "jason.greene(a)jboss.com" wrote : | In general we should avoid expanding our usage of this until we know that the design is even fixable. | If Google can search a googol of entries in a split sec, I don't see why we couldn't do the same for a handful of beans and aspects. Kabir, what's the current search/matching mechanism? Can it be made plugable? Or how much would it take to improve that? Idea of Lucene or Hadoop (on a single cpu) comes to my mind ... :-) Or basically any decent BTrees impl should do. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230686#4230686 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230686

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: swimlane candidate roles - task list allocations

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

IMO it's a design discussion topic. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230685#4230685 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230685

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: swimlane candidate roles - task list allocations

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | How are task lists impacted when we are using swimlane candidate-groups which both a user and a group of users [organisation] can belong? | I was wondering about "candidate-group" and "candidate-user" as well. Not sure if that fits your question, but I'll throw it in anyway: - Should those two statement be mutual exclusive an a single task activity? - Why a "candidate-user" in the first place? - Does a set of "candidate-users" form an artificial "candidate-group"? - How does re-assignment fit into the picture? Who is privileged to re-assign a task? Does the user need to be in one of the "candidate-groups"? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230684#4230684 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230684

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2009