May 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Where is Beta1?

by kukeltje

Sigh... one area JBoss really needs a more professional environment. How do other projects do this? Or do they just take more time? Then we should as well. I *hate* it when the project site is out of date, not up to date or whatever (it hasn't been right for at least 3 years) (sorry to rant) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229462#4229462 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4229462

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: How to Expose MBean Invocation Stats into admin-console?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

As soon as the ProxyManagedDeploymentFactory is working adequately, I'll update the current managed object wiki with all of the recent changes. The current page is: http://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-11349 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229461#4229461 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4229461

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Various performance issues in core projects

by dimitris＠jboss.org

Nice job, jaikiran! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229432#4229432 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4229432

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1800 Current status on performance improvement

by jaikiran

Since the issues are mostly in the projects that EJB3 uses (like MC and AOP), i'll try to isolate each of these issues separately. Here's the first few http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229402#4229402 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229403#4229403 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4229403

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Various performance issues in core projects

by jaikiran

While working on EJBTHREE-1800, we found that most of the issues were either related to AOP or MC. So i created a simple plain MC app (no EJBs in picture) with 101 MC beans and each MC bean having 100 methods each. Like this: | package org.myapp.mc; | | import org.jboss.beans.metadata.api.annotations.*; | | public class MCBean2 | { | | @Inject | private SomeOtherInterface otherBean; | | | public SomeOtherInterface getOtherBean() | { | return this.otherBean; | } | | | | public void method1(){} | public void method2(){} | public void method3(){} | public void method4(){} | public void method5(){} | public void method6(){} | public void method7(){} | public void method8(){} | public void method9(){} | Each MC bean has just one plain @Inject and 100 non-annotated methods. When i deployed this on my system, it took close to 2 seconds for this to be deployed. There's nothing fancy in this application, so i would have expected this to be faster. But this timing aligns with what we are seeing with the EJB3 deployment (we do not deploy the EJB impl class as MC beans but we do deploy the EJB containers as MC beans). Based on what i could see for this plain MC application in JProfiler, here are the issues (so far): 1) As mentioned in the other thread, MC looks for annotations on every method on every MC bean for annotation plugins (org.jboss.kernel.plugins.annotations.CommonAnnotationAdapter). So 100 methods * 101 beans. During this process, the call leads to org.jboss.metadata.plugins.loader.reflection.AnnotatedElementMetaDataLoader.getComponentMetaDataRetrieval which has this code: SecurityActions.findMethod(clazz, signature.getName(), signature.getParametersTypes(clazz)); | similarly for constructors and fields: | constructor = SecurityActions.findConstructor(clazz, signature.getParametersTypes(clazz)); | | field = SecurityActions.findField(clazz, signature.getName()); | This call ultimately leads to org.jboss.reflect.plugins.introspection.ReflectionUtils.findMethod/findField/findConstructor, which have code like this: | public static Method findMethod(Class<?> clazz, String name, Class<?>... parameterTypes) | { | if (clazz == null) | return null; | | Method[] methods = clazz.getDeclaredMethods(); | if (methods.length != 0) | { | for (Method method : methods) | { | if (method.getName().equals(name)) | { | Class<?>[] methodParams = method.getParameterTypes(); | if (methodParams.length != 0) | { | if (Arrays.equals(methodParams, parameterTypes)) | return method; | } | else if (parameterTypes == null || parameterTypes.length == 0) | return method; | } | } | } | return findMethod(clazz.getSuperclass(), name, parameterTypes); | } | | | Same applies for the findConstructor and findField. As can be seen, this method calls the expensive Class.getDeclaredMethods() and then iterates over the method to figure out the correct method. Remember, this method gets called for each method on each MC bean (100 * 101 for this application alone) which ultimately leads to performance issues. Profiler shows me there are 33232 calls to the Class.getDeclaredMethods() each taking an average of 297 micro sec. I changed the implementation of these methods (findMethod, findConstructor and findField) and see good enough performance improvements: | public static Method findMethod(Class<?> clazz, String name, Class<?>... parameterTypes) | { | if (clazz == null) | return null; | | try | { | Method method = clazz.getDeclaredMethod(name, parameterTypes); | return method; | } | catch (SecurityException se) | { | throw se; | } | catch (NoSuchMethodException nsme) | { | // check on superclass if present | if (clazz.getSuperclass()!=null) | { | return findMethod(clazz.getSuperclass(), name, parameterTypes); | } | else | { | return null; | } | | } | | } | The calls to the less expensive Class.getDeclaredMethod and Class.getDeclaredField (and so on..) show that the average time of the calls has drastically dropped down to 9 micro sec. This issue is similar to the one i reported here (in a different class) http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=154875 2) The org.jboss.kernel.plugins.annotations.CommonAnnotationAdapter iterates over each method to apply the annotation plugins for those methods: | ...//code trimmed | Set<MethodInfo> methods = info.getMethods(); | if (methods != null && methods.isEmpty() == false) | { | for(MethodInfo mi : methods) | { | ClassInfo declaringCI = mi.getDeclaringClass(); | // direct == check is OK | if (declaringCI != objectTI && visitedMethods.contains(mi) == false) | { | Signature mis = new MethodSignature(mi); | MetaData cmdr = retrieval.getComponentMetaData(mis); | if (cmdr != null) | { | methodPlugins = getPlugins(ElementType.METHOD, METHOD_FILTER, annotationClasses); | for(T plugin : methodPlugins) | { | if (isApplyPhase) | applyPlugin(plugin, mi, cmdr, handle); | else | cleanPlugin(plugin, mi, cmdr, handle); | } | //code trimmed | As can be seen, during this process the getPlugins(...) is called for each method even though the getPlugins(...) is not per method specific. The getPlugins internally iterates over the available plugins (which are a lot) and then applies filtering for each annotation class and does other stuff. The call to this method can be moved out of the loop to improve the performance: | Set<MethodInfo> methods = info.getMethods(); | if (methods != null && methods.isEmpty() == false) | { | //moved out of loop | methodPlugins = getPlugins(ElementType.METHOD, METHOD_FILTER, annotationClasses); | for(MethodInfo mi : methods) | { | ClassInfo declaringCI = mi.getDeclaringClass(); | // direct == check is OK | if (declaringCI != objectTI && visitedMethods.contains(mi) == false) | { | Signature mis = new MethodSignature(mi); | MetaData cmdr = retrieval.getComponentMetaData(mis); | | This too shows an improvement in the performance. 3) The org.jboss.kernel.plugins.annotations.CommonAnnotationAdapter also has a piece of code which looks for static methods: | // static methods | MethodInfo[] staticMethods = getStaticMethods(classInfo); | if (staticMethods != null && staticMethods.length != 0) | { | for(MethodInfo smi : staticMethods) | { | | if (smi.isStatic() && smi.isPublic()) | { | Signature mis = new MethodSignature(smi); | MetaData cmdr = retrieval.getComponentMetaData(mis); | if (cmdr != null) | { | if (methodPlugins == null) | methodPlugins = getPlugins(ElementType.METHOD, METHOD_FILTER, annotationClasses); | | for(T plugin : methodPlugins) | { | if (isApplyPhase) | applyPlugin(plugin, smi, cmdr, handle); | else | cleanPlugin(plugin, smi, cmdr, handle); | } | } | | /** | * Get the static methods of class info. | * | * @param classInfo the class info | * @return the static methods | */ | protected MethodInfo[] getStaticMethods(ClassInfo classInfo) | { | return classInfo.getDeclaredMethods(); | } | I think the call to classInfo.getDeclaredMethods() can again be avoided, since we already have the methods of this class (a few lines before this call). So this change/fix: | // static methods | if (methodPlugins == null) | methodPlugins = getPlugins(ElementType.METHOD, METHOD_FILTER, annotationClasses); | | for (MethodInfo method : methods) | { | // if the method was already visited, then no point processing it again | if (!visitedMethods.contains(method)) | { | // ensure that the method is static and is declared in the class being processed | if(method.isStatic() && method.getDeclaringClass().equals(classInfo)) | { | Signature mis = new MethodSignature(method); | MetaData cmdr = retrieval.getComponentMetaData(mis); | | if (cmdr != null) | { | for(T plugin : methodPlugins) | { | if (isApplyPhase) | applyPlugin(plugin, method, cmdr, handle); | else | cleanPlugin(plugin, method, cmdr, handle); | } | } | else if (trace) | log.trace("No annotations for " + method); | } | } | | } | 4) Deployers - I see that every MC bean that gets deployed, also gets registered as a MBean. Is this required? During the MBean registration, i saw this piece of code (which Jprofiler shows as expensive, given the number of MC beans being registered as MBean) in org/jboss/deployers/structure/spi/helpers/ComponentDeploymentContext.java: | public ObjectName getObjectName() | { | if (objectName == null) | { | String name = getName(); | name = name.replace("\"", """); | String temp = "jboss.deployment:id=\"" + name + "\",type=Component"; | The String.replace is marked as a costly operation. I changed this to: | Index: src/main/java/org/jboss/deployers/structure/spi/helpers/ComponentDeploymentContext.java | =================================================================== | --- src/main/java/org/jboss/deployers/structure/spi/helpers/ComponentDeploymentContext.java (revision 87763) | +++ src/main/java/org/jboss/deployers/structure/spi/helpers/ComponentDeploymentContext.java (working copy) | @@ -139,8 +139,9 @@ | if (objectName == null) | { | String name = getName(); | - name = name.replace("\"", """); | - String temp = "jboss.deployment:id=\"" + name + "\",type=Component"; | + //name = name.replace("\"", """); | + name = ObjectName.quote(name); | + String temp = "jboss.deployment:id=" + name + ",type=Component"; | try | { | objectName = new ObjectName(temp); | | The question however still remains, do we really need to register each MC bean as a MBean? With all these changes (across various projects), i have been able to deploy that sample application now within around 1.1 seconds(which i think is still on the higher side). I am going to continue looking into other issues and see how much improvement it brings in to the EJB3 deployments. P.S: I have all the patches ready if anyone wants to take a look. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229402#4229402 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4229402

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: New console snapshot published, Task Forms included

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

is there an example in the source code ? i couldn't find a .ftl in the sources ideally, such a template example would be included in the distro. in the examples in the distribution, there is an ant script to deploy all the examples to a running database. it would be great if the task examples could include forms, and that the example.bar deployment in the script would include the .ftl task form resources. the idea is that the user downloads and unzips jbpm, then runs a target that installs jboss, jbpm into jboss, start the jboss server, loads the example identities, deploys the example processes, installs and starts eclipse. then users would have a web app in which they can start browsing and trying things out. i'll see if i can start from your description here and get a task form running on the first task example View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229399#4229399 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4229399

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Where is Beta1?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

the docs are actually from beta 1 (see javadocs) but the website is horrible to update. i'll rename the version to latest. that way we don't have to maintain that website. when the website update mechanism becomes more usable, we can switch back to indicating the actual latest release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229396#4229396 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4229396

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Remaining test failures

by jmesnil

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : PagingFailoverTest It's what I'm working on now. | | JMSServerControl2Test - Which test you see failing now? I tried it in a loop and it passed. | Same for me: I ran 200 times JMSServerControl2Test and it always passes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229395#4229395 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4229395

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Deployment Framework] - JSR 250 injection on VDF

by wolfc

Right now we have a couple of injection frameworks. I have yet to see one that is not flawed when running on top of MC. There are three layers (for the moment let's ignore javax.interceptor) of injection: - JSR 250 - VDF - MC JSR 250 is the JavaEE standard of injection. The big difference with the other two is that it goes through JNDI. VDF injection is something that's currently underestimated, more on this later. MC injection is your basic @Inject of MC beans. The big difference here is that it is unscoped. (The moment somebody besides Adrian understands ScopedKernelController, I'll revise that statement. ;-) ) The most important thing to understand is the difference between installing and starting a component. At any moment a component can be installed, but it's not ready to service any calls at that time. A component is ready to accept calls when all of its dependencies are satisfied. This must include the injections. Unless MC injection is used almost everybody forgets these! The injection framework must never rely on runtime components to determine dependencies. It leads into problems like https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5713 . So the usage of InjectionContainer during that phase is wrong. But EJB3's metadata view is only complete after InjectionContainer is reinitialized ( http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=154877 ), because of AOP. Keeping the EJB3's metadata view out of sight, an alternative is the MappedReferenceMetaDataResolverDeployer. But this thing is too bloated to do fine grained resolving. So to have fine grained resolving the Resolvers came into being: - DataSourceDependencyResolver - EjbReferenceResolver - PersistenceUnitDependencyResolver http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/jpa/trunk/dep... http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/ejb3/trunk/co... http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/jpa/trunk/dep... (The actual Resolver contract still needs to be ironed out, some of them are returning bean names (not usable by JSR 250), others JNDI names (what about dependencies?).) This is where VDF comes into play. To do a JSR 250 style injection using MC you need to scope it correctly. VDF is the only one who knows the deployment scope (/ deployment unit). So I would need to pull a stunt as in PersistenceUnitValueMetaData.findBean & getPersistenceUnitBeanName to do the same thing with MC injection. http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/jpa/trunk/mci... A component-factory onto MC ( http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/component-fac... ) will not work, because it ignores the scoping rules layout out by JavaEE. It's even unaware of VDF. So we need a common injection framework that works on MC/VDF (/JBoss Reloaded ;-) ) and is usable somehow by EJB3 containers. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229381#4229381 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4229381

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal Documentation] - NEW Farma!!!! Viagra, Parlodel, Femcare

by farma_best

<a href=http://shop.best-farma.co.cc/>http://s58.radikal.ru/i161/0905/b7/e0786e78e907.jpg http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486 <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>24 hour pharmacy <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>24 hours pharmacy <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>a pharmacy <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>about pharmacy <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>adipex online <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>aid pharmacy <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>and pharmacy <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>at the pharmacy <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>ativan pharmacy <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>australia online <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>bc pharmacy <a href=http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486/>beat pharmacy wikkid <a href=http://shop.best-farma.co.cc/>beat pharmacy wikkid times <a href=http://shop.best-farma.co.cc/>best online pharmacy <a href=http://shop.best-farma.co.cc/>best pharmacy <a href=http://shop.best-farma.co.cc/>buy online <a href=http://shop.best-farma.co.cc/>buy pharmacy buy pharmacy info canada online canada pharmacy canadian online pharmacy canadian pharmacy canadian pharmacy online caremark cheap online cheap online pharmacy cheap pharmacy cheap pharmacy online cheap pharmacy online rx cheap pharmacy online rx com chemist chemists clinical pharmacy cod online college of pharmacy com/pharmacy compounding degree online dexedrine discount discount pharmacy dispensing doctor online drug online drug store drug stores drugs online drugs pharmacy drugs pharmacy net drugstore online drugstore pharmacy eckerd pharmacy european pharmacy eva pharmacy faculty of pharmacy fast online fioricet online first pharmacy for pharmacy formulary generic online generic online pharmacy generic pharmacy good pharmacy homeopathic pharmacy hospital pharmacy hospitals hour pharmacy hours pharmacy hydrocodone hydrocodone online in pharmacy international pharmacy internet pharmacy journal of pharmacy journal of pharmacy and line pharmacy london school of pharmacy medication medications medicine and pharmacy medicine online medicines meds online mexican pharmacy mg online modafinil of medicine and pharmacy of pharmacy of pharmacy and of pharmacy and pharmacology of pharmacy in of pharmacy technician official pharmacy online buy online canada online consultation online degree online delivery online doctor online drug online drug store online drugs online drugstore online medicine online order online ordering online pet online pharmacies online pharmacy online pharmacy no online pharmacy no prescription online phentermine online prescriptions online price online sale online shipping online tramadol online-prescription order order online order pharmacy organic pharmacy pet online pharm pharmaceutical pharmaceuticals pharmacie pharmacies pharmacist pharmacists pharmacy pharmacy affiliate pharmacy affiliate program pharmacy and pharmacology pharmacy assistant pharmacy chain pharmacy chain 36.6 pharmacy chains pharmacy checker pharmacy college pharmacy com ua pharmacy companies pharmacy company pharmacy drug pharmacy education pharmacy express pharmacy forum pharmacy hotnewsletter pharmacy hotnewsletter net pharmacy in london pharmacy in usa pharmacy inc pharmacy industry pharmacy info pharmacy is pharmacy job pharmacy jobs pharmacy kiev pharmacy kiev ua pharmacy locations pharmacy london pharmacy ltd pharmacy market pharmacy museum pharmacy net pharmacy news pharmacy of sound pharmacy on pharmacy on line pharmacy online pharmacy online rx pharmacy online rx com pharmacy org pharmacy practice pharmacy retail pharmacy review pharmacy school pharmacy schools pharmacy search pharmacy services pharmacy shop pharmacy store pharmacy tech pharmacy technician pharmacy technician in pharmacy uk pharmacy university of pharmacy usa pharmacy vol pharmacy volume pharmacy wikkid pharmacy wikkid times pharmacy zp pharmacy zp ua pharmacy.co pharmacy.com phentermine phentermine-online pills online prescription prescription drugs prescription online prescription-pharmacy prescriptions price price online provigil purchase rite aid rite aid pharmacy riteaid russian pharmacy russian pharmacy in rx rx online rx pharmacy salary sale online school of pharmacy soma online steroids online superdrug the first pharmacy the pharmacy tijuana pharmacy tramadol online university pharmacy vicodin wallgreens without prescription worldwide pharmacy worldwide pharmacy net www cheap pharmacy www cheap pharmacy online www pharmacy zp www pharmacy zp ua www.pharmacy xanax xanax online Men Drugs Shop Category: Allergy Allegra Astelin Atarax Clarinex Claritin Periactin Phenergan Prednisone Zyrtec Category: Anti Fungal Diflucan Grifulvin V Lamisil Lotrisone Mentax Nizoral Category: Anti Viral Bactroban Combivir Epivir Famvir Rebetol Retrovir Valtrex Zovirax Category: Anti-Acidity Metoclopramide Category: Anti-Depressant Abilify Celexa Cymbalta Desyrel Effexor Elavil Endep Lexapro Loxitane Luvox Pamelor Paxil Prozac Risperdal Seroquel Sinequan Tofranil Wellbutrin Zoloft Zyprexa Category: Antibiotics Albenza Amoxil Ampicillin Augmentin Bactrim Biaxin Ceclor Cephalexin Chloromycetin Cipro Cleocin Doxycycline Duricef Flagyl Floxin Ilosone Keflex Levaquin LIV52 Lukol Minomycin Myambutol Omnicef Prograf Rulide Septilin Sumycin Suprax Symmetrel Trecator-SC Trimox Vantin Zithromax Zyvox Arava Benemid Didronel Evista Feldene Ibuprofen Relafen Category: Asthma Advair Diskus Beclovent Brahmi Flovent Aerosol Pulmicort Serevent Singulair Ventolin Category: Blood Pressure Accupril Aceon Adalat Aldactone Altace Atacand Avapro Calan Capoten Cardarone Cardizem Cardura Cordarone Coreg Coumadin Cozaar Diltiazem Diltiazem HCl Diovan Enalapril Florinef Furosemide Hytrin Hyzaar Imdur Inderal Isosorbide Mononitrate Kerlone Lanoxin Lasix Lisinopril Lopid Lopressor Lotensin Lozol Mexitil Mextil Micardis Microzide Minipress Norvasc Persantine Plavix Plendil Tenormin Toprol XL Trandate Vasotec Vastarel Verapamil Zebeta Zestoretic Zestril Category: Cancer Arimidex Casodex Eulexin Hydrea Methotrexate Nolvadex Xeloda Category: Cholesterol Crestor Gemfibrozil Lipitor Mevacor Pravachol Shuddha Guggulu Tricor Vytorin Zetia Zocor Category: Diabetes Actoplus Met Actos Amaryl Avandamet Avandia Diabecon Glucophage Glucotrol Prandin Starlix Category: Erectile Dysfunction Category: Erection Packs Viagra 10 pills x 100 mg + Cialis 10 pills x 20 mg Viagra 10 pills x 100 mg + Cialis 10 pills x 20 mg + Levitra 10 pills x 20 mg Viagra 30 pills x 100 mg + Cialis 10 pills x 20 mg Viagra Soft 10 pills x 100 mg + Cialis Soft 10 pills x 20 mg Category: Eye Drops Atropisol Betagan Betoptic Ophthacare Category: Fat Burners Category: Gastrointestinal Aciphex Carafate Cimetidine Colospa Diarex Maxolon Motilium Nexium Pepcid Prevacid Prilos Protonix Reglan Zantac Category: General Health Abana Accutane Acne-n-Pimple Cream Acticin Antabuse Aricept Atrovent Benzac Betapace Brand Temovate Calcium Carbonate Clarina Coral Calcium Daivonex Depakote Detrol Diamox Differin Dilantin Eurax Exelon Geriforte Heart Shield (Heart Disease) Karela Kemadrin Lamictal Lariam Leukeran Levothroid Levoxyl Mestinon Neomercazole Oxytrol Primaquine Purim Retin-A Snoroff Styplon Sustiva Synthroid Topamax Triphala Tulasi Valporic acid ER Vermox Viramune Zerit Zofran Category: Hair Care Finasteride Hair Loss Cream Propecia Rogaine Selsun Category: Herbal Products Category: Insomnia SleepWell (Herbal Xanax) Category: Men's Health Apcalis SX Apcalis SX Oral Jelly (Orange flavor) Avodart Brand Cialis Brand Levitra Brand Viagra Caverta Cialis Cialis Professional Cialis Soft Cialis Super Active Cloud Nine BigPRX Cloud Nine HGH Cloud Nine Regrowth+ Dutas Flomax Himcolin Himplasia Kamagra Kamagra Flavored Lasuna Levitra Penegra Penisol Proscar Silagra Speman Tadacip Tadalis SX Tentex Forte Tentex Royal Viagra Viagra Capsules Viagra Flavored Viagra Oral Jelly Viagra Professional Viagra Soft Viagra Super Active Category: Other Ashwagandha Azulfidine Buspar Confido Cyklokapron Cystone Cytotec Danocrine Dostinex Duphalac Elimite Gasex Geodon Imodium Imuran Kytril Mentat Sinemet Tegretol Zyloprim Category: Pain medicine Aleve Arcoxia Cafergot Celebrex Deltasone Ditropan Emulgel Imitrex Indocin Lioresal Maxalt Mobic Monoket Motrin Naprosyn Neurontin Nimotop Shallaki Tizanidine Tylenol (Acetaminophen) Urispas Voltaren Voltarol Zanaflex Category: Penis Enlargement VPXL - Category: Stop Smoking Nirdosh Zyban Category: Test Stimulants Category: Weight Loss Acomplia Cloud Nine Hoodia 800 Hoodia Slimfast (Herbal Phentermine) Xenical Zimulti Category: Women's health Alesse Aygestin Clomid Danazol Duphaston Evecare Female Viagra Femara Femcare Fosamax Gestanin Gyne-Lotrimin Lynoral Menosan Norimin Norplant Ovral Parlodel Ponstel Premarin Provera Sarafem Serophene Shoot Zelnorm http://shop.best-farma.co.cc/ http://www.linkbrander.com/go/76486 http://map.b13.su/ http://allmap.hostevo.com/ http://allmap.hostevo.com/map1.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map2.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map3.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map4.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map5.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map6.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map7.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map8.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map9.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map10.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map11.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map12.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map13.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map14.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map15.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map16.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map17.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map18.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map19.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map20.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map21.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map22.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map23.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map24.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map25.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map26.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map27.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map28.html http://allmap.hostevo.com/map29.html View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4229377#4229377 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4229377

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2009