September 2009 - jboss-dev-forums

[JBoss ESB Development] - Re: XPath Routing

by tfennelly

"Kevin.Conner(a)jboss.com" wrote : Why do yet another C&P job when it is not necessary? I don't think anyone was suggesting doing a C&P job. So you want an attribute containing an alias of some sort on it Vs specifying the actual class? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256421#4256421 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256421

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0 Development] - Re: ThreadLocalPool - Is it working the way we think?

by andy.miller＠jboss.com

"wolfc" wrote : Two issues: | 1. the original ThreadlocalPool was designed incur zero thread contention. This changed when statistics were implemented. Right now that uses sync blocks, but it could be changed to atomics. Still it would incur a penalty. | 2. a ThreadlocalPool servicing a ThreadPool with a size > 100 will always have a lower throughput than a StrictMaxPool with maximum size 100. The maximum size of ThreadlocalPool is not applicable. | | To really identify performance bottlenecks within enterprise beans you would need to know: | - average queue size | - average execution time | - average wait time | | We also need to microbench all the pool implementations to see their effect on throughput & average response time. Yes, the statistics require synchronization, which is part of the point. If you need the statistics, then you lose the benefits of it being a ThreadLocal. I also seem to remember that it also synchronizes on the ArrayList for the instance references too though. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256419#4256419 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256419

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss ESB Development] - Re: XPath Routing

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

"burrsutter" wrote : So I like both options. :-) There is no reason why both can't be used as the configuration is already being passed through to the CBR implementation. Each can easily have configuration specific to their own implementation. Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256417#4256417 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256417

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss ESB Development] - Re: XPath Routing

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

"tfennelly" wrote : From a users POV, I also don't like the idea of having to specify 2 classes i.e. the ContentBasedRouter action and the the cbrClass property to specify the ContentBasedRouter implementation (so... "....XPathRouter" and "....RegexRouter"). That sucks imo :) Totally agree, which is why you shouldn't do that. The cbrClass is there to provide the users with a way of overriding what we do, not configuring what we do. At the moment that class has a default value for drools but only because that is the only one we support at present. Add an attribute to override this, make it simple. Why do yet another C&P job when it is not necessary? Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256413#4256413 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256413

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Web Services Development] - Re: JBossSTS SOAP protocol handler

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

Dan, the question was whether the SAML assertion can be used as the authentication construct rather than username/pwd or a X509 certificate (as supported by the WS-Security implementation in JBossWS). This was what Stefan and I were referring to. At this time, I think you should forget about the authentication aspect and just focus on passing the saml assertion to the wst client and let the STS handle the token. Maybe you can have a single username/pwd for the ESB layer with the STS to pass in the WS-S headers. Or better some type of X509 certificate that is mutually agreed on. There are two different things: 1) There needs to be a security context for the client and the STS to interact. This is what is passed in the ws-s headers. Can be username/pwd or x509 cert. 2) And then there is the payload (in this case, the SAML assertion) that the STS will use to validate. >From what I see, the item 1 is a trust association between the ESB and ESB client. We can set it up once. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256412#4256412 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256412

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Re: kernel unit test failures

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

The only error I get is SetJaxbTestCase error, Alexey is looking into it. This shouldn't affect what you are doing, so try excluding that one test in the pom View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256408#4256408 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256408

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Re: kernel unit test failures

by smarlow＠redhat.com

I am still getting the same unit test failures (even after building with an empty local maven repo and no local kernel code changes). If I skip the maven tests, I get a missing artifact error on "org.jboss.kernel:jboss-kernel:test-jar:tests:2.2.0-SNAPSHOT" (see http://pastebin.com/m189a44de) Perhaps, I need some changes that others have only locally (Kabir mentioned not seeing these errors)? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256389#4256389 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256389

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss ESB Development] - Re: XPath Routing

by tfennelly

>From a users POV, I also don't like the idea of having to specify 2 classes i.e. the ContentBasedRouter action and the the cbrClass property to specify the ContentBasedRouter implementation (so... "....XPathRouter" and "....RegexRouter"). That sucks imo :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256382#4256382 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256382

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss ESB Development] - Re: XPath Routing

by burrsutter

My original vision of this feature was to have the XPath expression (and/or Regex expression) "inline" - embedded in the jboss-esb.xml. The inline approach makes it much, much easier from a learning curve standpoint. It does require a reload/redeploy of the jboss-esb.xml and its .esb archive to make a change happen. I think inline is a must-have for learning curve standpoint. The value of the external file approach, like in the Drools-based CBR, is that I can change the file without causing a redeploy of the .esb archive, no touch to jboss-esb.xml. So I like both options. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256381#4256381 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256381

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss ESB Development] - Re: XPath Routing

by tfennelly

"tfennelly" wrote : Just to be clear Kev... you want the XPath "rules" to be in an external rules file Vs being inline in the ESB config? Of course... both options would be nice from a users pov. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256380#4256380 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256380

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2009