Tom Jenkinson [
http://community.jboss.org/people/tomjenkinson] created the discussion
"Re: Remote txinflow: XID changes"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/632776#632776
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Little wrote:
Aren't we mixing two different issues here? How we represent the
node name within TS (within the XID structure) and how that node name is presented to
users/administrators? Our top priority has to be data consistency in the presence of
failures. If that means that a sys admin either can't do something for a while
(because, say, a centralised name server that maps int node names to a nice string is
unavailable) or has to work with ints, then I'm prepared to consider that any day over
the alternative.
+1
All I want is for nodeIdentifiers to be provided to TS through the CoreEnvironmentBean as
an integer and that the same recoverable instance of TS gets the same integer node name
each time, I can then happily encode this in the XID and failure recovery etc proceeds as
normal. What systems are used to provide that node identifier to TS should be largely a
black box to me.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/632776#632776]
Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]