David Lloyd [
http://community.jboss.org/people/dmlloyd] created the discussion
"Re: Remote txinflow: XID changes"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/632570#632570
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Little wrote:
Is it possible to play tricks with the EIS name? I suspect that N(EIS) <<<
N(nodes), so maybe we can require EIS names to be maintained in a configuration file and
index that by 2 bits in the bqual. OK, maybe 2 bits is too small, but you get my meaning
;)
Yeah that's a good idea. What we're looking for isn't so much the
node name as it is a reproducable identifier for the +connection+, right?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/632570#632570]
Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]