Jason Greene [
http://community.jboss.org/people/jason.greene] created the discussion
"Re: Remoting Transport Transaction Inflow Design Discussion"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/627831#627831
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Little wrote:
I suspect that the recent comments also gave credence to the fact that there was a push
to get something, no matter what, into 6.0.
Just to clarify my position is
1. We need a decent stop-gap for EAP 6.0, whatever that may be
2. We need the real solution in EAP 6.1
The fork comment wasn't emotive, it was a practical reality. If the TX project was not
going to do a 4 release that fixed the problem, then soemone else would have to. It's
essentially the same way we handle a thirdparty project (e.g. apache) that does not share
our schedule.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/627831#627831]
Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]