[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Re: [jboss-metadata] Validation on completely merged view

henk de boer [http://community.jboss.org/people/henk53] created the discussion "Re: [jboss-metadata] Validation on completely merged view" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/600409#600409 -------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, that does make sense. I noticed though that internally JBoss sometimes uses the non-portable names, like in e.g. JBossEnterpriseBeanMetaData. I also have spotted code like this on a couple of occasions: private static String getLocalJndiName(JBossEnterpriseBeanMetaData ejb, Class<?> ejbClass)    {       // See if local binding is explicitly-defined       LocalBinding localBinding = ejbClass.getAnnotation(LocalBinding.class);         // If none specified       if (localBinding == null || (localBinding.jndiBinding() != null && localBinding.jndiBinding().trim().length() == 0))       {          String name = ejb.getLocalJndiName();          return name;       }       // Local Binding was explicitly-specified, use it       else       {          return localBinding.jndiBinding();       }    }   (this is from ResteasyEjbDeployer) Code such as this never works with no-interface views, so the only way out for the user (except for patching the code) would be if the LocalBinding annotation was allowed on EJB beans without an interface. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/600409#600409] Start a new discussion in JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]