"ips" wrote : From the Jopr/client perspective, we prefer that each type of MO
has a unique component type, rather than having to look at the MO's name to figure out
exactly what type of MO it is. For example, we'd much prefer something like...
How does this look:
http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/JBossAS/?cs=89563
...?
S,
ALR
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4234290#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...