Re: [rules-dev] Question about kie - api & kie - internal (OSGIactivator)
Hi,
you can see that almost all dependencies of drools and kie comes from a
jar/bundle that is hosted by the maven central repository.
Besides the fact that embedding a jar into a bundle is possible and
sometime the only possible way, I don't think it is a clean solution.
In that specific case we will punishing non-osgi people since it will
consume a jar bigger than the necessary.
regards,
Cristiano
On 30/03/13 11:14, Christian Frommeyer wrote:
Am 27.03.2013 16:34, schrieb Charles Moulliard:
> Adding poi-ooxml + poi-ooxml-schemas is more complex than I supposed as
> the code source of poi-ooxml-schemas has not been published in maven
> repo ;-)
Hi,
can s.o.explain to me why it would be necessary to have POI exported as
OSGI-Bundle? As far as I know it would be no problem to put the poi libs
to the Bundle-Classpath and keep them secret. Is this only a nice to
have, to have an all OSGI-Solution or is there some need that I don't see?
Regards Christian
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev