Re: [rules-dev] log4j.xml

Fernando Meyer or Michael Neale..any comments or thoughts? I guess I am of the belief that drools-repository/src/main/resources/log4j.xml should NOT be bundled into drools-repository.jar because it causes exactly the problems described by Geoffrey De Smet below. > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:46:03 +0200 > From: Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com&gt; > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] log4j.xml > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Message-ID: <fcns7f$f68$1(a)sea.gmane.org&gt; > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Artifacts (jar or wars) used by 3th parties shouldn't contain a > log4j.properties or log4j.xml in the root. > If they do, the logging configuration depends on the order of the jars > in the classpath, which is hard, error-prone and a bad practice to > control. > > Solution: > - namespace the log4j.xml, like I did in drools-solver, use a > DomConfigurer (or what's it called) at the initialization of the > application. However that will be hard in a war I believe. > - or use sl4j? > > With kind regards, > Geoffrey De Smet _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev