Re: [rules-dev] drools-spring and drools-guice
Barry Kaplan wrote:
Mark Proctor wrote:
> Ultimiately the integration should be quite lightweight - mostly about
> creating rulebases and working memory and probably the scoping and
> caching of these. I guess you could also have some life cycle management
> about objects themselves and auto assertion/retraction to named working
> memories.
>
>
Sorry for the late entry Mark. If this the desired scope, the work I did for
2.0 is probably highly relevant. It had factory beans for creating WM and
such. Is that code checked into the jboss version of the repository?
I've not been monitoring this one, you'll need to katch up with Paul
Browne, who is doing most of the work behind this.
-barry
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.2 KB)