Re: [rules-dev] Why are fundamental API functions not part of "stable"?
On 20 August 2010 21:56, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
try this:
for ( KnowledgePackage pkg : kbase.getKnowledgePackages() ) {
for ( org.drools.definition.rule.Rule rule : pkg.getRules() ) {
String name = rule.getName();
org.drools.rule.Rule realRule = ( org.drools.rule.Rule
) ((KnowledgePackageImp)pkg).getRule( name );
System.out.println( realRule.getAgendaGroup() );
}
}
Very well hidden - almost an 'Easter egg ;-)
Thank you!
At the drl it'll stay, for backwards comptability for a while,
we'll map
it onto the new planned constructs. I have plans over all for something
more generic, orthogonal and thus more flexible and powerful.
At one time, I thought that the metadata map would be the place where
things are kept. - I canimagine that a selection mechanism based on
s.th. like general property predicates would give you all you've got now
(possibly even with long-term backward compatibility) and plenty of new
possibilities. "Sharing" of rule sets among focusable grouds is one thing
I'd very much like to have...
-W