Re: [rules-dev] [rules-users] before/after behavior for negative pattern
@Mario: Could this be something in mvel2-2.1.0.drools16.jar?
With Drools 5.3.0, this works fine:
rule "Detect it"
when
$start : RawEvent()
not RawEvent(this != $start, id == $start.id, $start after[0ms, 90s]
this)
then
System.out.println("detected: " + $start);
end
Moving on to 5.4.0, you get the error "Unable to Analyse Expression this !=
$start &&...", as reported previously by Rob.
@Rob: As a workaround, use
not $re: RawEvent(eval($re != $start),...
(And I'd recommend using new Random( 12345 ) to obtain repeatable test
outputs.)
-W
On 1 September 2012 20:23, Rob21 <rob.perrez(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I tried using FireAllRules each time i inserted an object instead of
FireUntilHalt in another thread. Unfortunately it results in the same error
message :
Unable to Analyse Expression this != $start && after0.evaluate( $start,
this
):
[Error: unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
com.sample.RawEvent.after0()]
[Near : {... this != $start && after0.evaluate( $start, this ....}]
^ : [Rule name='Detect it']
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Could not parse knowledge.
at com.sample.DroolsTest.readKnowledgeBase(DroolsTest.java:106)
at com.sample.DroolsTest.main(DroolsTest.java:54)
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/before-after-behavior-for-negative-patt...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.6 KB)