Re: [rules-dev] DSL expansion: ready for commit

On 15/12/2010 09:38, Wolfgang Laun wrote: > Constraining the scope of applicable when-fragment might be added on > top of the current DSL syntax, providing a compatible migration path. > Notice that constraining the scope is similar to the rule attribute > "auto-focus", but unqualified entries may have to remain active > throughout. > > Expansion will have to be able to handle insertions not only for the > last preceding pattern but also to other parenthesized condition > phrases, e.g. eval, forall, etc. yaml looks pretty nice these days, as the underlying document storage format.

Mark > > -W > > > > On 15 December 2010 10:18, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org > <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote: > > Thought I'd mention where I'd like to see DSLs go in the future, > if anyone is interested. DSLs are template fragments that can be > used in conjuction with each other. I'll refer to them as > template fragments from now on. > -Selecting one template fragment constraints which peer fragments > may be used after it. > -Template fragments may have nested template fragments. The > available nested fragments are themselves constrained and > depending on which child fragment is chosen cosntrains any > allowed peer child fragments. > -As well as constraining which peer or child fragments can be > used cardinality can also be constrained. > -The peering and nesting itself can be recursively applied, > > So what we are talking about here is something that is almost xsd > schema like, for producing constrained documents. > > Mark > > On 15/12/2010 07:41, Wolfgang Laun wrote: >> On 13 December 2010 19:58, Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:ed.tirelli@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> Mark said you would like us to take a look at some of your >> commits? >> Can you let me know which ones? >> >> >> Hi Edson, >> >> I have reached a state where I think changes might be committed >> - see the attached README. I'll just go through the code and add >> some comments and make sure no "noise" remains. Then I'll send >> you the zipped tarball of all changes. If there are no >> objections, I'll also commit, but I need to do this before the >> git change incapacitates me. (I just don't have the time right >> now for making this conversion, and I won't have it until >> E12/2010. Worst time of the year for doing a change like that!) >> >> @developers: Anybody interested in this set of changes can ask >> me for the sources. >> >> Best >> Wolfgang >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev