Re: [rules-dev] Request for Community Release of drools-core-5.1.2 with fix from JBRULES-3630

So let's get this straight: I find, debug *and* patch the problem for you, and then you expect me to pay you to release it as well? You. Are. Dreaming. On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: > We don't' publish community patch releases for maintenance of older versions. > > The cost is simply too high, as releasing can take several days and must be tested. More importantly this is how Red Hat provides value to our paying subscription customers - where we provide 5 years of patch releases, without features. See this blog for more information: > http://blog.athico.com/2011/04/drools-jbpm-community-versus-product.html > > If you would like a BRMS subscription, where a patched jar can be provided, please contact sales(a)jboss.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev