Re: [rules-dev] Bug in Sudoku Example - with fix
Would appreciate if someone would post the patch here or post a URI to
the patch because I just finished developing the Japanese version of
the examples and would like to keep it in sync.
H.Ozawa
2010/2/10 Michael Neale <michael.neale(a)gmail.com>:
want to make a .patch file someone can apply?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:43 PM, jschmied <nabble(a)juergenschmied.de> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I found a bug in the rule 6,7 and 8 in the sudoku example:
>
> It should not only test against the PCV but against the RCV too:
>
> Rule 6:
> # the not operator only causes this when clause to resolve to true when
> there are not
> # any other PCVs or RCVswith the same row and value as $possible
> not (PossibleCellValue( row == $row, value == $value ) ||
> ResolvedCellValue(
> row == $row, value == $value) )
>
> 7 and 8 are similar.
>
>
> juergen
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Bug-in-Sudoku-Example-with-fix-tp196315p196315.html
> Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev