Re: [rules-dev] JBRULES-2932: suspicious syntax might be the cause?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>wrote:
This is correct syntax, although the parens are redundant in this
particular situation.
Technically, this is called a "multi-restriction". Expand it by inserting
the field (answer.ID) in front of each relational operator. It's inherited
from COBOL :-)
OK, so then this issue is a valid bug? Thanks for your help.
L
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 703 bytes)