Also things in the future like neural nets and other potentially
learned data. I guess whatever we call it it will be the deployable unit
Sent from my iPhone
On 04/01/2008, at 5:48, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
Vineet Khosla wrote:
> Peter Jackson supports the wiki concept. Knowledge base has 'both
> rules and various declarations'.
> Lets keep it 'rule base'.
rule base isn't so appropriate now, as we also have Processes in
it. We already have functions, and soon enough we'll also add in
Templates for class definitions (already there, but not exposed).
>
> Vineet
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Massi Gmail <mmquelo(a)gmail.com>
> To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2008 5:49:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [rules-dev] KnowledgeBase
>
>
> Reading the wikipedia doc, It seems that a knowledgebase does not
> only contain data in a "Rule Format" but
> even other kind of information. For instance information like the
> "object model".
>
> As far as I understood the rulebase does not contain anything
> related to the object\fact model.
>
> So I would say that the rulebase is "part of" the knowledge base
> and not the "knowledgebase" itself.
>
> It's just an idea....
>
> Massi
>
>
>
>
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.
> Try it now.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev