B Berteh wrote:
My company made a (quite detailed) benchmark of a few business rules
languages (~20), including criteria such as expressiveness,
user-friendliness for business and IT people, formal quality and other
aspects such as tools support.
I don't think we can be beat for expressiveness
and user-friendliness.
For benchmarks you are best off making prototypes of your problem
domains and test those. The academic benchmarks are next to useless as
the vendors cheat. If you do want to look into this the two main ones
are Manners and Waltz, I give a detailed look into Manners in the
examples documentation.
We did not include the particular SBVR compliance as it was not
finalized at that time, but If you're interested I could send it tomorrow.
B.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:34:14 +0200
From: mmquelo(a)gmail.com
To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-dev] Rule Engine Benchmarking...
Hi there!
I was wondering whether there exists a complete benchmark on
Drools Rule Engine or not.
Is there any new public benchmark comparing Drools to another Rule
Engine?
In case I should do it by myself, what set of parametes should I
consider in order
to benchmark a Business rule engine?... I mean the minumum set.
I spent a couple of weeks reading stuff on BRMS and I think the
main parameters are:
SBVR compliance, JSR 94 Compliance, RETE compliance, Inference
performance, usability...
Could You suggest me anything else?
Thank you very much.
Kind regards.
Massimiliano
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arrêtez le ping pong, et recevez votre réponse dans la seconde !
Windows Live Messenger <
http://messenger.live.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev