Re: [rules-dev] Why are fundamental API functions not part of "stable"?
Please note that I am and was well aware of org.drools.rule.Rule. But this isn't
available from what you get via StatefulKnowledgeSession, KnowledgeBasae,
KnowledgePackage. See below.
On 20 August 2010 17:46, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
On 20/08/2010 11:13, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> StatefulKnowledgeSession session = ...;
> for( KnowledgePackage knowledgePackage:
> session.getKnowledgeBase().getKnowledgePackages() ){
> for( Rule rule: knowledgePackage.getRules() ){
> ???
>
> but it turns out that this "rule" object is of the interface type
> org.drools.definition.rule.Rule
> implemented by
> org.drools.definitions.rule.impl.Rule
> which is just as meagre as the interface. Dead end, apparently.
You looked at the wrong implementation. Notice that Rule is also
implemented by org.drools.rule.Rule. That one has the meat you need.
This is what I wrote:
> Using other classes like Package or RuleBase from the
"unstable" part
> of the API to get at
> the "real meat" in org.drools.rule.Rule isn't really a way I want to
go.
>