Re: [rules-dev] Valid or not valid: 1 < foo < 10?
On 07/02/2012, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
On 07/02/2012 08:49, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Developers:
>
> it would be *very nice* to have a clarifying statement as to whether
> the triplex relational expression is valid or not, so that a proper
> issue might be raised.
I discussed this with edson, he spat out his corn flakes and said it
would be a cold day in hell before he adds that request :)
My request was for *clarification*, as some people appear to think that
MVEL permits that. (You know me well enough by now to guess what
I think of triplex relations.)
>
> Status in 5.3.0: accepted by the DRL parser and resulting in unknown
> semantics.
We'll tighten that to correctly report an error for next 5.4 release.
Hojotoho!
-W