Re: [rules-dev] Breaking Changes Suggestions
I've collected a few things I've been moaning about... They are
intended to make DRL programming more convenient, given the current
set of the Engine's capabilities, i.e., enhance Drools' usability!
AFAIK, none of these proposals would break backward compatibility.
Cheers
Wolfgang
On 27/03/2012, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
I've put up a wiki page to collect thoughts on ideas that would
involve
breaking backwards compatability in Drools. It's aimed to produce ideas
for Drools 6.0.
No suggestion is too silly, think of it as a brainstorming area for
alternative syntaxes and behaviours to what we have now, so knock
yourself out.
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/BreakingChangesSuggestions
Mark
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev