Re: [rules-dev] Conway example - update to use ruleflow

Hi Michael. I think Mark was working on a "stateful" conways example (the old was stateless) - I wasn't sure if he got to using ruleflow (just check first). Ruleflow is probably very useful to most people who would have used agenda-groups - agenda-groups are a stack, which is not intuitive to most people, but ruleflows are more imperative, so examples showing that are appreciated. I would almost go as far as to say that *most* of the time when you want control, you want ruleflow (you will know if you want agenda). Correct me if I am wrong, ruleflow is new to me ! Michael. On 5/16/07, *Anstis, Michael (M.)* <manstis1(a)ford.com <mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote: Just to let you know I am updating the example to use ruleflow (it looks like one or more rules are wrong too as the "glider" doesn't glide, so I'll have a look at these also). Doesn't look particularly taxing so should have it done very soon - provided the wife doesn't complain that she's not seeing much of me in the evenings ;-) With kind regards, Mike _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev