Re: [rules-dev] removing DSLs
I value source code compatibility much higher than a guided editor. We do
all out rules editing in a plain text editor.
But we absolutely need the certainty that we can compile and run our
existing mortgage scoring rules for our mission-critical system with the
next major version of drools.
After all, rules also are what they are termed in Guvnor: assets. Please
protect my assets.
Thanks
Ansgar
Am 29.01.2013 00:08 schrieb "Mark Proctor" <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>:
How would people feel if we removed DSLs from 6.0? There is no
decision
either way, but I wanted to see if people liked or disliked the idea.
My reason for this is I don't believe DSLs in their current form, beyond
demo ware, are useful. They need a lot more work to turn them into guided
structured documents, we don't have the people to focus on that right now,
and no one from the community has taken this on.
I'd rather see them removed, until they can be done properly.
Mark
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.5 KB)