Re: [rules-dev] Possible Bug: Nodes of inherited types with drools.getActivation().remove()
This would not happen if I did not use
"drools.getActivation().remove(); "
but
I need to or else rules fire over the same object. But if i use it
then a
rule
gets deactivated without firing.
... Ok I think it's def a bug. I noticed that if i remove the number of
repeats: W
hen I use "drools.getActivation().remove()" the number of activations is
**roughly half**
Well based on the '~statistics~', I'd say that an
"getActivation().remove()" is
removing 'two' activations instead of one.
Looking fwd to hear you theory and solution. Statistics are a wonderful thing,
you can misiterpret them as you like.. lol. :o) Ok, please let me know what you
find!
thanks,
Arjun