I 'll take a look, hopefully friday afternoon :)
But I did notice you using assembly 2.1 instead 2.2-beta-1 (in parent pom).
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
Mark Proctor wrote:
geoffrey,
I believe you have commit rights ;)
Mark
Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
>
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> Mark Proctor wrote:
>> At the moment we have 3 assemblies, bin, src, brms. I couldn't get
>> the drools-*.jar libs to go i na different direction to the
>> dependencies, so now all jars are in the same directory.
>
> In maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta1 you can use <excludes> and
> <includes> in dependency sets, so you can define 2 <dependencySet>,
> each to a different dir.
>
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/assembly.html
>
>> Also for ease of distribution I don't think I'm going to have a bin
>> (without deps) and bin-withdeps, I'll just package the deps in as
>> default now.
>>
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/src/main/assembly/
>>
>> build.xml and ant are now deprecated and most likely don't work, we
>> will remove soon.
>>
>> The documentation and the eclipse plugin are now profiles
>> -Ddocumentation=true and -Declipse=true. However it seems that
>> somehow the docbook pathing has got screwed and isn't outputting
>> properly, edson?
>>
>> Mark
>> Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
>>> > PS I was trying to make a way to put dependencies in a seperate
"lib"
>>> > folder, but maven didn't recognise the <dependencySets> tag -
just
>>> > thought it would make for a neater distro for those not using maven.
>>>
>>> Are you using the war or the assembly plugin to create the war?
>>>
>>> Both versions are locked down in the parent pom (which will be
>>> enforced from maven 2.1 btw)?
>>>
>>> They released maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta1, and I used
>>> dependencySet successfully in there. What exactly do you want to
>>> assemble?
>>>
>>> PS: to keep the "mvn install" on the parent pom with all modules
>>> fast, I can really recommend to do assembly's in a seperate profile.
>>> I usually call this profile "production", but "complete"
would be a
>>> good name too.
>>>
>>> <profiles>
>>> <profile>
>>> <id>production</id>
>>> <build/plugins/plugin>
>>> <artifactId>maven-assembly-plugin</>
>>> <execution>
>>> <phase>package</>
>>> <goals/goal>assembly:attached</>
>>> </>
>>> <configuration>...
>>>
>>> So normal builds do:
>>> mvn install
>>>
>>> Complete builds do:
>>> mvn -Pproduction install
>>>
>>> Other examples of goals that take to long are jar signing etc for
>>> webstart, that really needs to be in the "production" profile.
>>>
>>> With kind regards,
>>> Geoffrey De Smet
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael Neale wrote:
>>>> BRMS is now added as a seperate file (just the war).
>>>> Its a largish file (~20 meg it will be, all told) - so one other
>>>> idea is a seperate download.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Michael.
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Michael.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev