Re: [rules-dev] Modules description on the wiki or in the pom.xml description?

>> I have thought for a long time I'd be good to have on the Wiki a >> summary of what each project represents and what package (JAR) >> they bundle into.

Here is a starting point if anyone wants to keep busy: http://community.jboss.org/wiki/Modules Mark On 27/10/2010 04:37, Lucas Amador wrote: > Hi all, > drools-assistant is the module that I created to add refactoring > support in the eclipse plugin/guvnor. The last weekend I fixed the > integration with eclipse and they will be commited in the next days, > maybe tomorrow :) > > Regards, > > Lucas > > On 26 October 2010 23:09, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org > <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote: > > On 26/10/2010 22:57, Michael Anstis wrote: >> Hi Geoffrey, >> >> Being relatively new I can't comment on some of the specifics, >> but I question the following:- >> >> * drools-assistant >> * drools-atom >> * drools-clips (I believe Mark did this on a rainy weekend, >> but don't know if it's still supported). >> * drools-container >> * drools-doc\drools-docs (which is actively used?!? Do we >> need both?) >> * drools-rhq-plugin >> * drools-simulator >> * install >> * src >> >> I have thought for a long time I'd be good to have on the Wiki a >> summary of what each project represents and what package (JAR) >> they bundle into. > You just volunteered yourself for your first task next november > when you start ;) > > Mark > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Mike >> >> On 26 October 2010 15:59, Geoffrey De Smet >> <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I am looking at cleaning up the build and moving to maven 3, >> to make it >> faster, more reliable, etc. >> I am also actively wondering if some modules or files aren't >> dead code. >> First candidate is drools-atom: >> >> The module drools-atom is in limbo: >> - It still exists >> - It's not part of any build >> - Does it still build? No >> -- 'dependencies.dependency.version' is missing for >> org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:jar >> - Does it still compile against the latest drools version? >> Idunno, but >> since it's not part of the build, tomorrow's refactor might >> break it. >> - Does anyone use it? If it doesn't build and it isn't >> released... no? >> >> I don't think that code is useful to anyone in this state. I >> do think >> it's presence alone slightly complicates the drools sources. >> >> >> What do we do with it? >> - [A] remove the directory drools-atom from trunk (it's still >> retired in >> in subversion) >> - [B] leave it like it is now. It might be usefull to someone >> - [C] add it to the build again, make it work >> - [D] create a separate repository "drools-incubator" and >> move it there >> >> In my opinion: >> +1 for [A] >> -1 for [B]: either it builds or it's not in trunk >> >> >> If we all agree that removing dead modules is a good idea, I >> 'll provide >> a list of possible candidates next time. >> >> -- >> With kind regards, >> Geoffrey De Smet >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev