Re: [rules-dev] Usage of rules-users
IIRC, absolute beginners' question aren't making the list
inhomogeneous. (Poor netiquette is not necessarily a Drools beginner's
symptom.) I think that separating vertically (planner,
guvnor/workbench, expert+fusion) is the way to go.
This is also (roughly) the way (most) Qs are answered: by Geoffrey,
Michael, and others.
Cheers
Wolfgang
On 14/05/2014, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
I've asked geoffrey to setup a separate mailing list for planner,
and to
write on the optaplanner website what questions should not be asked on the
Drools lists.
We can setup an additional two new google groups for Drools. One for expert
DRL questions and one for Workbench questions. Or maybe we just need to
create a drools-noob list, and direct first starters there? That may
actually be the best way for now, to reduce some of the most basic Qs.
Mark
On 13 May 2014, at 09:47, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> the amount of (what is) noise (to me) on the users list has steadily
> increased over time. Several distinct topics appear (to me) to be
> bunched together needlessly, and I'm beginning to use interest in this
> list. IIRC, there was some talk several months ago, that things like
> planner, JBPM and Guvnor should have their own lists, but nothing has
> come of that.
>
> Best
> Wolfgang
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev