@Mark: That's a bit hasty. OP reported "problems" when trying to do
the 20 times 30k rules. And the loading time of 40 - 60 seconds was
reported for a measly 30k rules.
-W
On 13/08/2013, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
https://plus.google.com/103145805595719456130/posts/8cuDsNtURXE
:)
Mark
On 13 Aug 2013, at 15:13, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
>
> On 13 Aug 2013, at 15:04, nmsundar <sundar_m(a)solartis.net> wrote:
>
>> @Mark Proctor :
>>
>> Ok mark , I will move this to user list .
>>
>> what is the maximum number of rules kb can hold on it ?
> There is no maximum - it's what ever your memory and CPU can take. But
> largest we'd seen so far in real life was 250K for a medical system.
>
> Tbh if you are loading 600K rules in about 45seconds, that seems pretty
> reasonable to me. Some other commercial systems would not scale to that
> :)
>
> Actually thinking about this, we should be asking you to do a public
> testimony - "Drools scales to 600K rules for a real production system",
> let me know if you can :)
>
> If you do start profiling (which would be nice if you could) you can ask
> Qs about Drools internals here. Or on irc:
>
http://www.jboss.org/drools/irc
>
> But further Qs on partitioning, or general "how to" or "What's
> recommended" Qs, should be continued on the USER list.
>
> Mark
>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Reg-Handling-large-number-of-rules-tp40...
>> Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list
>> archive at
Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>