Shahad Ahmed wrote:
The front-end of the BRMS destined for Drools 5 appears to use the
GWT-EXT library, which in turn requires the Ext JS library. However,
one of my colleagues has pointed out that as of April 21st 2008, the
EXT JS library is now licensed under GPL (v3), whereas prior to this
it was licensed under LGPL.
I don't know too much about licensing, but isn't this going to have an
impact on the final Drools 5.0 licensing? From the little I know about
licensing, if you use a GPL library (ext-core.js etc in the BRMS) then
any derived code (e.g.. Drools) can only be distributed under GPL as
well, so Drools couldn't be distributed under Apache 2 anymore?
Its a bit bonkers of EXT JS to suddenly change a license from LGPL to
GPL and there is definitely a "heated" debate going on in the GWT-EXT
and other forums. I hope it's appropriate to post this on the dev
list, and apologies if not.
We are currently on 2.0.2, which does not require us to
be GPL. Either
way client side .js cannot infect server side code, so it wouldn't
impact the main product. We are looking to see if we can continue on a
lgpl fork.
Regards
Shahad
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev