No, that is not the same as a fully stateless scope where the object is looked up
everytime it is invoked, not everytime it is injected.
On 20 Apr 2010, at 17:07, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
Ok yeah, thats what I thought.
@Produces @New -- would that not work?
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Marius Bogoevici <marius.bogoevici(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 10-04-20 11:31 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> Wait -- there's no "Prototype" or "always new" scope?
@Dependent or @New, from case to case.
>
> --Lincoln
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Stuart Douglas <stuart(a)baileyroberts.com.au>
wrote:
> I don't think I will be able to implement the injection of InjectionPoint into
the producer method, but other than that it should be possible to implement.
>
> Stuart
>
>
> On 20/04/2010, at 8:15 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>
> > Yes, I agree. I had raised this issue during spec development - that there was
no truly stateless scope in CDI, where the bean instance was created every time.
> >
> > I would like to hear from the 299 EG about this as well.
> >
> > On 20 Apr 2010, at 04:57, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> >
> >> I think that there is a real use case for something similar to the @Unwrap
feature of seam 2.
> >>
> >> I think that it would be possible to implement something like this:
> >>
> >> @ConversationScoped
> >> public class ManagedPersistenceContext
> >> {
> >>
> >> EntityManager entityManager;
> >>
> >> @Unwrap
> >> @SomeQualifier
> >> public EntityManager produce(InjectionPoint injectionPoint)
> >> {
> >> entityManager.joinTransaction();
> >> return entityManager;
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> public class MyClass
> >> {
> >> @Inject @SomeQualifier EntityManager entityManager;
> >> }
> >>
> >> the way I envisage this working is that a proxy gets injected into MyClass,
and this proxy calls ManagedPersistenceContext.produce to resolve the correct
EntityManager to pass the call to every time a method is invoked on the proxy.
> >>
> >> I am pretty sure I can implement this in weld-extensions using JDK proxies,
does this sound like a good idea?
> >>
> >> Stuart
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> seam-dev mailing list
> >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
>
http://ocpsoft.com
>
http://scrumshark.com
> "Keep it Simple"
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
>
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
>
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev