Re: [seam-dev] Seam 2.1.2 release

Pete Muir wrote: > So apparently, I misremembered the outcome of this discussion > (which was that not having a GA qualifier breaks all sorts of > stuff), and we should go back to numbering them with the GA > qualifier. > > Max, will it break your stuff with this no-qualifier release in > there? Do we have to redo the release? I dont have it downloaded yet, but just try and add it as a runtime in JBossTools if you can do that it works...if not something gotta change ;)

But more importantly, maven repo needs it doesn't it ?

-max > > On 10 Jun 2009, at 11:48, Pete Muir wrote: > >> Right, but they don't reflect that we were asked to drop the GA >> qualifier. So, should we add it back in? >> >> On 9 Jun 2009, at 23:17, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> >>> The versioning guidelines is osgi afaik. >>> >>> /max >>> >>> Pete Muir wrote: >>>> :-) >>>> >>>> If someone would update the JBossVersioningGuideline wiki page, >>>> we'll be sure to follow it! >>>> >>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 16:38, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>>> >>>>> osgi standard is the one that actually is consistent. >>>>> >>>>> Maven 3 will be using osgi. >>>>> >>>>> Really don't think we were told to remove GA from the technical >>>>> names. >>>>> >>>>> /max >>>>> >>>>> Pete Muir wrote: >>>>>> Well to be maven compatible we should switch to -CRX, -BETAX >>>>>> etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually, I think it was OSGi, not maven that has the problem >>>>>> you describe. Anyway, we always use explicit versions (and >>>>>> recommend this to people using our poms) so it should be ok... >>>>>> >>>>>> Do people think we should just switch to the maven standard? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 15:12, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought this renaming did not apply for maven bundles as >>>>>>> the maven resolution mechanism was retarded. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 08:43, Pete Muir wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope, JBoss has changed their versioning guidelines, and no >>>>>>>> longer applies .GA to final releases... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Going forward, there will be no more GA suffix (but we still >>>>>>>> use .CRX, .BETAX etc.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 00:41, Asgeir Frimannsson wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----- "Norman Richards" <orb(a)nostacktrace.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It's out. I'm still waiting on IT to updated the latest/ >>>>>>>>>> latest-2/ >>>>>>>>>> latest-2.1 docs links, but otherwise the release process >>>>>>>>>> should be >>>>>>>>>> done. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There seems to have been a small glitch with the naming of >>>>>>>>> the 2.1.2 release in maven: >>>>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/seam/jboss-seam/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would expect '2.1.2.GA' rather than '2.1.2'? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Congrats on the release! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>> asgeir >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> seam-dev mailing list >>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev