Re: [seam-dev] Interceptor packaging convention
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
BTW A slightly better approach (which avoids at least the nastiness
of this approach, but
doesn't avoid the issue of ordering - which IMO is insurmountable) is to write a
SeamInterceptor which can cope with using relative ordering semantics and require users
to just enable that.
Sure, but the problem is that then you can't interleave other
interceptors with the Seam interceptors.
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org