Re: [seam-dev] Impact of the change of scope (EVENT to SESSION) of the EjbSynchronizations SFSB component?

So, do you think this change is OK or do you think the change should be rollbacked (revert to the EVENT scope) and another solution should be investigated to solve JIRA-4542? On 06/04/2010 05:41 AM, Pete Muir wrote: > In that case you need to disable Seam Managed Transactions (see the ref guide for more). > > On 3 Jun 2010, at 19:44, Steve Roy wrote: > > >> Should a transactions really be started at that early of an entry point in application code? The application code may need to do many things before a database(or other resource) transaction is actually required. >> >> - steve >> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Pete Muir<pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote: >> I'm slightly (sorry, that's irony ;-) concerned about this, it just seems wrong. System transactions are request scoped in Seam. >> >> Why do we need to do this? >> >> On 3 Jun 2010, at 17:08, Denis Forveille wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Recently, to address JIRA-4542 >>> (https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBSEAM-4542) , the scope of the >>> EjbSynchronizations component has been changed from EVENT to SESSION. >>> >>> I'm worrying about the impact of such a change on the behavior on Seam >>> applications >>> >>> Is this change safe? Is there really no impact on the applications? >>> >>> Please have a look at JIRA-4542 for more details >>> >>> Thx. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> seam-dev mailing list >>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> seam-dev mailing list >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev