On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 15:55, Clint Popetz <clint(a)42lines.net> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 13:23, Clint Popetz <clint(a)42lines.net> wrote:
>
>> My impression is that the conversation control API isn't part of CDI yet,
>> so until it is it has to be weld-specific.
>
>
> It's planned for CDI 1.1. There is a portable conversation module that is
> bridging this gap in the interim. As Jason mentioned, we need to make it
> more clear how to use it (and that it exists).
>
>
And if you put it in m2 central, I think I can probably convince him to use
it.
Got it. I'll check on the status of the sync. If the sync isn't working,
then we'll see if we can just publish using the Seam credentials...at least
the parts of Seam that the Wicket CDI integration would need.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction