Currently it is:
"java.lang",
"java.util",
"javax.annotation",
"javax.inject",
"javax.enterprise.inject",
"javax.enterprise.context",
"javax.enterprise.event",
"javax.decorator",
"javax.interceptor",
Should the root namespace for seam-xml be changed to
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee? I
did not use this originally for portability reasons, as other CDI implementations might
not like having 'foreign' elements in this namespace in beans.xml.
Stuart
On 14/06/2010, at 4:43 PM, Gavin King wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Stuart Douglas
<stuart(a)baileyroberts.com.au> wrote:
>> ---------
>> Seam XML
>> ---------
>>
>> * CDI annotations need to come from the CDI namespace, not the Seam namespace.
For example:
>>
>> <s:Qualifier /> or <s:Specializes /> -> <cdi:Qualifier />
or <cdi:Specializes />
>
> What namespace is <cdi: bound to?
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee?
>
> If so should I dump the seam namespace entirely, or just move the annotations into a
different namespace?
Things that are annotations or types from the CDI/EE packages
javax.enterprise.inject, javax.inject, etc, should all live in the
default namespace. Not quite sure what it should be called, but the
spec used to say:
The Java EE namespace urn:java:ee represents the following packages:
• java.lang
• java.util
• javax.annotation
• javax.enterprise.inject
• javax.enterprise.context
• javax.interceptor
• javax.decorator
• javax.enterprise.event
• javax.ejb
• javax.persistence
• javax.xml.ws
• javax.jms
• javax.sql
Now, for what we're doing, that list is probably a bit long and could
be trimmed.
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org