> So Ales - is it a violation of contract to have a
non-Serializable DU,
> or is the test making an improper assumption?
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=139413
Let's see what's the response on this one, since I though - from the
name - that managed objects don't need to be serializable (+ together
with JBoss Managed project --> a mechanism to pass the required
serializble client info).
Carlo brought up a good point; since this gets tied into metadata, and
all metadata must be Serializable.... ;)
I'll be fixing this up today and putting it in the next jboss-metadata
release (Beta30).