Re: [seam-dev] Testsuite discussion notes
Can we please make it a priority to get the Solder testsuite updated to
the new structure and all the tests passing? Once this is done, the
rest of the team can help out by updating the other modules to follow
the same configuration.
Shane
On 20/09/11 18:09, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
Marek is working on integration tests while me and Tomas are working
on functional tests.
On 09/20/2011 12:24 AM, Jason Porter wrote:
> No, we didn't assign it to anyone.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 19, 2011, at 16:19, Shane Bryzak<sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Was it decided who would take care of the testsuite restructure? I
>> must
>> admit I wasn't paying much attention during this discussion ;)
>>
>> On 19/09/11 23:39, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
>>> INTEGRATION TESTS
>>>
>>> Structure:
>>>
>>> - api
>>> - impl
>>> - testsuite / src / test / java
>>>
>>> Container-specific issues
>>> - there will be a BaseDeploymentFactory that creates base deployment
>>> based on a system property (arquillian container name)
>>> - there will be no common package scheme for now
>>>
>>> Default profile
>>> - weld embedded
>>> - skipped tests if weld embedded does not make sense in the context of
>>> the module
>>>
>>>
>>> FUNCTIONAL TESTS
>>> - m4 will be used to generate pom files from our templates (stored in
>>> Seam QA github)
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev