Like Arnold Schwarzenegger, let's call it the @Instantiator
;)
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Stuart Douglas <
stuart(a)baileyroberts.com.au> wrote:
> I tried that, it did not work in weld, and according to the spec it is not
> required to work.
>
> We need the scope to be a Normal scope as we are after a client proxy,
> however according to the spec normal scopes need to follow the rules that I
> included below.
>
Ah, got it now.
>
> I talked to Pete about this and I am going to resurrect the
> @ManagedProducer stuff I did in WELDX a while ago, but with javassist rather
> than JDK proxies. These work by injecting a dependent scoped proxy into the
> bean, and the proxy calls the @ManagedProducer method every time to get the
> instance to invoke the method on. This also has the advantage that you can
> inject the InjectionPoint into the @ManagedProducer method.
>
Cool.
>
> I am not totally sold on the name @ManagedProducer, but as previously
> discussed making up names is not really my strong point :-)
>
To be honest, names are just tough in general. I've got a couple of
suggestions:
PerpetualProducer
ContinuousProducer
Activator
Regenerator
>
> I committed an initial implementation last night, it still needs a bit
> more work but it should be functional.
>
As always, great job!
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev