Re: [seam-dev] Re: Seam/RESTEasy integration
Pete Muir wrote:
On 4 Mar 2009, at 18:06, Dan Allen wrote:
> Thanks for the response Bill. Let's line that up with what we have today.
>
>
> * Unique URIs to each "page"
>
> We are going to call these "pretty" or "friendly" URLs and it is
> slated for JSF 2.1. We intentionally want to avoid the word REST here.
Actually, I think this comes with page parameters, as those define a
unique URI (but not path) for a resource. URL rewrite just makes em look
nice.
Query parameters really shouldn't contain information about identity.
You can't create URI hierarchies then. For example:
For example:
/customers
/customers/123
/customers/123/address
But I guess this is the "prettiness" factor and nothing really to do
about whether it is RESTFul or not.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com