I prefer the latter also.
seam content is also a strong name than seam jcr
Em 26/02/2011, às 19:46, "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
George,
Yes, I have basic structure that can be put into both api and impl. No test
cases right now though. We can argue over annotation names if you'd like
:-)
Shane,
What top level package do you suggest? org.jboss.seam.jcr ?
org.jboss.seam.content ? I'd prefer the latter, especially if we do
eventually look at implementation specific features.
John
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:17 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Excelent! I am thrilled to start working on it. Shane, if you could
please
create the project that would help.
John, do you have anything implemented to push into this repository ?
Em 26/02/2011, às 18:12, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> escreveu:
It's great to see this collaboration take place, and it's quite obvious to
me that the idea of a Seam JCR module would be appealing to many
developers. George and John, would you both be willing to work on this
module together? For the time being I propose that we create a Seam JCR
project at github (and treat it as a sandbox for now) which you can both
commit to. I can put the basic project skeleton in place so that it
conforms in structure to the other Seam modules. What do you think?
On 27/02/11 04:08, George Gastaldi wrote:
Excelent idea. I was thinking also to connect the JCR event model to CDI.
An integration with Seam Security should also be planned.
I am also available to work on it.
2011/2/26 John D. Ament < <john.d.ament@gmail.com>john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>
> George,
>
> Funny you bring up this topic this week. I was planning to propose a Seam
> Content module this week, mostly because my schedule is finally clear enough
> to allow me to work on it. At this point, I have basic capabilities to
> inject the necessary JCR objects into CDI beans and that all works. I will
> admit though, I am a little biased towards ModeShape as that is the other
> JBoss project I work on. Cross platform support would work correctly using
> the service loader + repository factory approach. In addition to basic
> injection support, I was also looking to provide the equivalent of a
> SeamManagedPersistenceContext for JCR.
>
> There are also some ModeShape specific features I was bouncing around,
> including CDI enabled connectors, sequencers; as well as connecting their
> event model w/ CDI's event model.
>
> What do you think about those ideas?
>
> John
>
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:06 AM, George Gastaldi <<gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>
> gegastaldi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I was thinking to create a Seam JCR module to allow JCR (Java Content
>> Repositories) to be injected in code. It should work for jackrabbit as
>> well as modeshape or any other jcr 2.0 compliant implementation. Any
>> suggestions ? Comments appreciated.
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> <seam-dev@lists.jboss.org>seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list <seam-dev@lists.jboss.org>seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev>https://lists.jboss....