Your smiley suggest that this has been already discussed / decided. I missed
those discussion apparently. Sorry...
Antoine
2011/6/29 Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Yes, we should do this :-)
Marius is the owner.
On 29 Jun 2011, at 14:28, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> 3 weeks ago I started a consulting mission in a big Insurance company
that is Redhat / JBoss customer. They use most of Java EE 5 implementation
provided by JBoss 5 EAP except for EJB 3. No EJB because it's also a Spring
Shop. One of my missions is to help them to build their next official stack
based on JBoss EAP 6 (which should be out in January). So I try to promote
full Java EE 6 stack (with CDI and EJB 3.1) and put Spring aside as an
alternative/Legacy framework. But it won't work if they don't have a
supported solution to use their old Spring components / Knowledge in this
new stack.
> More globally one big objection I encounter very often with the adoption
of CDI (at least in France) is investment done in Spring. So if we want to
facilitate the adoption we have to provide a Bridge with Spring to allow
devs to integrate the "de facto standard" in the "official
standard".
> I know that Rick Hightower and CDISource Team wrote a nice extension on
the subject (
https://github.com/CDISource/cdisource) but I think such a
module should be endorsed by a company that'll provide support on it like
RH.
> Seam 2 provided this Bridge so it seems normal to provide it as well in
Seam 3.
> What is your opinion ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Antoine Sabot-Durand
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Antoine Sabot-Durand
Manager technique
-------------------------------
Ippon Technologies
3, rue Bellanger
92300 Levallois Perret
t. 01.46.12.48.48
f. 01.46.12.48.49
p. 06.08.55.34.26
e. asd(a)ippon.fr
www.ippon.fr