On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I'm pleased to say that Seam Remoting 3.0.0 is now compiling and
works
with the ported hello world example in CDI.
Cool :-)
Since bean names are now an optional thing, I was wondering whether
I
should support remoting with non-named beans. I could probably do it by
just allowing a fully qualified class name, what do you guys think?
It would be better to use a combination of bean type and qualifiers.
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org