This has been fixed already in JSF2.
On 23 Sep 2008, at 19:39, Dan Allen wrote:
I have added an issue to the JSF2 page that has bothered me since
day
one about JSF. As an application developer, I should not care that my
collection bound to a JSF data table is a java.util.Set vs a
java.util.List. I don't care that Set is not an indexed collection or
that the order might not be guaranteed (I'll use a LinkedHashSet or
TreeSet if I need that behavior). I have a collection and I want to
stuff it in a table. End of story. I have said as much in this P2
issue.
http://seamframework.org/Documentation/JSF2#H-ProperCoverageOfCollections...
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Software consultant | Author of Seam in Action
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, life and work come first and, at times, keep me away from my
mail
for a while. If you contact me, then don't hear back for more than a
week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a
message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev