So whats the plan with the tagging? Should I do it, or wait?
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Looking at it right now. It should be jsut a matter of switching
> the jar and testing the 2 demos
>
> On Apr 1, 2008, at 12:58, Pete Muir wrote:
>> Does it need to be in 2.0? How quick can you be?
>>
>> On 1 Apr 2008, at 17:49, Jay Balunas wrote:
>>> I have not put down the tag yet - but I'll leave it Pete and
>>> others ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>>> Humm
>>>> I wanted to put Groovy 1.5.x in it and give it a test
>>>> Let me know if I can
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 1, 2008, at 09:57, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>> Norman, Jay
>>>>>
>>>>> We're ready to start releasing 2.0.2.CR1 unless there are any
>>>>> objections. Please work your magic ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone, please don't commit to the 2.0 branch without
>>>>> checking first until Norman/Jay give the all clear.
>>>>>
>>>>> In general, the 2.0 branch of development is now frozen except
>>>>> for critical fixes and documentation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> P
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Pete Muir
>>>>>
http://www.seamframework.org
>>>>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Pete Muir
>>
http://www.seamframework.org
>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>>
>>
>>
>>
>