On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Right, and the question is, why not do the same thing again? Since
that
seems to work well, and will be familiar to Seam 2 users
Exactly. The point of all this is that we are restating what we need to do.
Seam 2 might have it, but Seam 3 doesn't yet :)
...at the same time, to answer Emmanuel's "what's different", we are
challenging what we had if there is a more agreeable way to satisfy the same
goals.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen