Re: [seam-dev] Seam 2.1.2 release

osgi standard is the one that actually is consistent. Maven 3 will be using osgi. Really don't think we were told to remove GA from the technical names. /max Pete Muir wrote: > Well to be maven compatible we should switch to -CRX, -BETAX etc. > > Actually, I think it was OSGi, not maven that has the problem you > describe. Anyway, we always use explicit versions (and recommend > this to people using our poms) so it should be ok... > > Do people think we should just switch to the maven standard? > > On 9 Jun 2009, at 15:12, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > >> I thought this renaming did not apply for maven bundles as the >> maven resolution mechanism was retarded. >> >> On Jun 9, 2009, at 08:43, Pete Muir wrote: >> >>> Nope, JBoss has changed their versioning guidelines, and no >>> longer applies .GA to final releases... >>> >>> Going forward, there will be no more GA suffix (but we still >>> use .CRX, .BETAX etc.) >>> >>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 00:41, Asgeir Frimannsson wrote: >>> >>>> ----- "Norman Richards" <orb(a)nostacktrace.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> It's out. I'm still waiting on IT to updated the latest/ >>>>> latest-2/ >>>>> latest-2.1 docs links, but otherwise the release process should >>>>> be >>>>> done. >>>> >>>> There seems to have been a small glitch with the naming of the >>>> 2.1.2 release in maven: >>>> http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/seam/jboss-seam/ >>>> >>>> I would expect '2.1.2.GA' rather than '2.1.2'? >>>> >>>> Congrats on the release! >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> asgeir >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> seam-dev mailing list >>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> seam-dev mailing list >>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev