Re: [seam-dev] User Management in seam-gen

Okay, I have verified that this section is no longer in the branch 2_0 docs (sorry, I had forgotten to update my branch SVN before looking). However, I do see one reference that still exists: <programlisting role="JAVA"><![CDATA[ new RunAsOperation() { @Override public String[] getRoles() { return new String[] { "admin" }; } public void execute() { identityManager.createAccount(username, password); identityManager.grantRole(username, "user"); } }.run();]]></programlisting> We probably just need a different example in the execute() since identityManager is not yet going to be available and will confuse the reader. Aside from this, we are thumb up in the branch! Looking forward to this feature in 2.1. Shane, let me know when you commit the seam-gen stuff and I will give you a hand if needed making sure it all looks consistent. -Dan On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Shane Bryzak <shane.bryzak(a)jboss.com&gt; wrote: > I'm pretty sure I already removed all references to this in the 2_0 branch. > > > > Dan Allen wrote: > > >> Two things are certain. It is documented in the 2.0.x branch (and will >> thus need to be removed) and it is not yet checked in to seam-gen in >> the trunk. The second point is understandable given that development >> is still underway. All things need time. However, the first item will >> need to be reversed. >> >> -Dan >> >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Norman Richards <orb(a)nostacktrace.com&gt; >> > wrote: > >> >>> On Apr 18, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Dan Allen wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm concerned that we have documented something that is not actually >>>> part of Seam yet. According to this section of the documentation: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > http://docs.jboss.com/seam/2.0.2.CR1/reference/en-US/html/security.html#d... > >>> >>>> ...there is a user management screen in seam-gen. However, I have yet >>>> to see this screen when I use seam-gen and I am guessing that unless I >>>> am missing something, it's because it doesn't exist. I think this >>>> would be a great feature, but we need to make sure that it is deliver >>>> if we say it is there. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I thought all that user management stuff was just for 2.1. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > >